Effects of Perioperative Cross-Sectional Pharmacological Management on Medical Safety: A 10-Year Retrospective Observational Study

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: The growing complexity of perioperative drug therapy, driven by an aging population, technological advancements, and an increasing number of surgical procedures, has led to an increase in drug-related incident reports. However, whether comprehensive pharmacist-led management can mitigate these incidents remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of perioperative cross-sectional pharmacological management on medical safety. Methods: This retrospective observational study evaluated medication-related incidents at Kameda Medical Center between 2013 and 2023 before and after implementation of a cross-sectional pharmacist-led perioperative care system. Incident severity and pharmacist interventions based on World Health Organization (WHO) Safe Surgery goals were analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square and Mann–Whitney U tests. Results: During Phase I (2013–2018), pharmacists at Kameda Medical Center primarily managed postoperative pain and ward-based medication oversight. In Phase II (2018–2023), a cross-sectional pharmaceutical management system encompassing preoperative outpatient clinics, operating rooms, and wards was introduced. The rate of medication-related incidents remained unchanged despite a 16% increase in surgical procedures. However, pharmacist interventions increased markedly, from an annual average of 149.6 cases in Phase I to 892.4 cases in Phase II. Level 0 and Level 1 incidents, representing near-misses and minor events, increased significantly, suggesting that proactive pharmacist involvement prevented more severe incidents. Interventions aligned with the Safe Surgery goals included pain management, prevention of anesthesia-related adverse events, mitigation of bleeding risks, allergy management, and optimization of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Standardized training and evidence-based checklists during Phase II likely improved the consistency and quality of care. Furthermore, integration of perioperative pharmaceutical records into the electronic medical systems enhanced interdisciplinary communication. Conclusions: These findings indicate that cross-functional, team-based pharmaceutical care contributes to improved perioperative safety and may serve as a model for future systems. This study provides a basis for evaluating scalability and cost-effectiveness across diverse healthcare settings.

Article activity feed