Accurate Microsatellite Instability Classification Using Ultima Genomics Platform Across Multiple Tumor Types

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI), a hallmark of mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd), occurs across multiple cancer types and carries distinct diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Accurate MSI detection is therefore essential in clinical oncology. Traditional approaches - mismatch repair Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-based assays - are widely used but may misclassify tumors, particularly in cancer types with a low prevalence of MSI. Although next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based methods provide improved accuracy, their adoption is constrained by cost. Here, we evaluate the UG 100 ® , a low-cost flow-based sequencing platform, for its ability to classify MSI status across diverse tissues and sequencing conditions. We developed and assessed complementary computational strategies, including (I) tumor–normal microsatellite indel (MS-indel) calling and (II) per-read and homopolymer variant analyses, supported by tumor-purity simulation experiments to test robustness in clinically realistic scenarios. Across a diverse validation cohort spanning cell lines, Fresh-Frozen (FF), and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) tumors, each method achieved near-perfect Area Under the ROC curve (AUROC). In dilution experiments, the MSI-score remained informative at low tumor fractions, distinguishing MSI from MSS cell lines down to ~ 5%. These findings demonstrate that UG 100 ® platform enables reliable MSI detection from low-coverage, tumor-only sequencing data. This capability positions flow-based NGS as a practical and cost-effective alternative to conventional MSI assays, with strong potential for broad clinical implementation.

Article activity feed