Comparator-dependent evidence for earlier PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) is moving from post-taxane metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) into earlier disease settings, but the context in which this migration is justified remains uncertain. We synthesized randomized evidence. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and meeting proceedings were searched through May 17, 2026. Randomized PSMA-RLT trials were included; conference reports were incorporated in sensitivity analyses. Random-effects models pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs) within prespecified strata. Treatment-effect interactions and risk of bias were assessed. Results Twelve trials involving 3,767 patients were included. In late-line mCRPC, PSMA-RLT improved progression outcomes (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32–0.80), with overall survival benefit established in VISION. In taxane-naive mCRPC after androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) progression, radiographic progression-free survival also improved (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41–0.84), with no attenuation versus late-line use (P for interaction = 0.624), although overall survival was not improved. Comparator type significantly modified benefit: efficacy was weaker against docetaxel than against ARPI switch (ratio of HRs, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.06–2.70; P for interaction = 0.026), and docetaxel-comparator trials showed no progression advantage (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.77–1.30). ENZA-p provided a distinct first-line combination signal, improving PSA progression-free survival (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29–0.63) and overall survival (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36–0.84). In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, progression outcomes improved (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57–0.84), whereas overall survival remained immature. Oligometastatic or oligorecurrent disease showed a strong but heterogeneous exploratory signal (HR, 0.17; I² = 90.5%). Available grade 3 or higher adverse-event data favored PSMA-RLT in taxane-naive mCRPC (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59–0.90) but indicated a modest increase with hormone-sensitive intensification (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04–1.33). Conclusions PSMA-RLT treatment migration is comparator-dependent rather than simply line-dependent. Randomized evidence supports its use after ARPI progression and before taxane therapy, without detectable loss of progression benefit versus late-line use, but does not support replacing docetaxel. Earlier hormone-sensitive use is promising but awaits mature survival data.

Article activity feed