Decoding Choices: Exploring the Primary Push and Pull Factors Shaping Medical Students' Preferences for a Transnational Medical Programme - A UK Case Study
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background International medical education pathways are increasingly sought by students facing competitive admissions environment in home countries or seeking global clinical opportunities. The Postgraduate Diploma in International Medical Sciences (PGDip-IMS) is a graduate entry programme, delivered through a UK - Caribbean partnership, offers an accelerated systems-based curriculum with opportunities for clinical training in the United Kingdom and United States. The purpose of this study was to explore the motivations, expectations, and experiences of students enrolled in this programme to better understand the factors influencing their decision-making and perceived alignment with long-term career goals. Methods A qualitative descriptive design was used. Fifty-two students completed an open-ended questionnaire comprising five questions addressing initial attractors, appealing programme features, career alignment, the role of institutional reputation, personal factors and advice for prospective students. Responses were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results Students’ decisions were shaped by a combination of international mobility, academic structure, career aspirations and personal circumstances. The UK location, the opportunity to complete clinical rotations in the US or UK and residency in US or Canada were the strongest pull factors. Students valued the USMLE-aligned systems-based curriculum, small cohort sizes and accelerated structure, which they perceived as supporting residency competitiveness and professional development. University reputation and accreditation was also considered as an important factor. Students described the PGDip-IMS programme as demanding and fast-paced, emphasising the need for resilience, adaptability, and strong time-management skills. Supportive faculty and a close-knit cohort were viewed as key strengths. Conclusion The PGDip-IMS programme attracts students seeking flexible, internationally oriented medical training and provides a viable pathway toward licensure in multiple healthcare systems. While students highlighted the programme’s intensity and the need for clearer communication around research expectations and licensure routes, they also emphasised its strong academic structure, supportive environment and alignment with long-term career goals. These findings offer valuable insights for programme development and contribute to broader understanding of student decision-making within transnational medical education.