Effect of a Combined Motivational Interviewing (MI) Intervention on Knowledge, Tooth-Brushing Behavior, and Oral Hygiene Status Among Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a behavioral approach widely used to improve oral health among adolescents. The integration of face-to-face MI with mobile application support has the potential to overcome limitations related to time and accessibility in conventional care. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a combined MI intervention (face-to-face and app-based) on oral hygiene status, knowledge, and tooth-brushing behavior among adolescents. Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a parallel-group design was conducted among 100 adolescents aged 13–15 years, who were randomly assigned to an intervention group receiving combined MI (face-to-face and app-based) and a control group receiving conventional face-to-face MI. The intervention was implemented over four months following structured MI stages, with assessments conducted at baseline and three follow-up points. Oral hygiene status was measured using the Oral Hygiene Index Simplified (OHI-S). Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon, Mann–Whitney, and effect sizes were calculated to assess the magnitude of change. Results: The intervention group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in OHI-S scores compared with the control group. The mean OHI-S score decreased from 3.19 ± 1.16 to 1.37 ± 1.06 (p < 0.001), indicating a large effect size. Conclusion: The combined MI intervention resulted in greater improvements in adolescents’ oral hygiene status compared with conventional MI. These findings highlight the potential of a hybrid MI approach as an effective strategy for adolescent oral health promotion; however, causal interpretations should be made with caution.

Article activity feed