<span class="word">Comparative <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">In <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Vitro <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Bioactivity <span class="word">of <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Traditional <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Aqueous <span class="word">and <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Alcoholic <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Preparations <span class="word">of <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Arnica (<em><span class="word italic">Chiliadenus <span class="word italic">glutinosus</em>), <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Effects <span class="word">on <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Marine <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Fish <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Pathogens, <span class="word">PLHC1 <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">Cells <span class="word">and
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Arnica (Chiliadenus glutinosus (L.) Fourr.) is an endemic plant widely used in Spanish traditional medicine as infusions and alcoholic macerates for different ailments. Despite this use, information about the biological activity of these preparations in fish-related models is scarce. In the present study, aqueous, ethanolic, and methanolic extracts were tested at different concentrations (0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg mL-1) to compare their antioxidant activity, effects on four marine fish pathogens, cytotoxicity on the PLHC1 tumour cell line, and their impact on immunological parameters in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) head-kidney leucocytes (HKLs). All extracts showed dose-dependent antioxidant activity, while bactericidal effects depended on the solvent and were mainly observed at the highest concentrations. Ethanolic and methanolic extracts displayed clear cytotoxicity, whereas the aqueous extract showed lower toxicity and was therefore selected for further evaluation. In a second assay, selected concentrations (0, 0.25, and 0.5 mg mL-1) of the aqueous extract were tested in leucocytes stimulated with λ-carrageenan (0 and 1,000 µg mL-1), and respiratory burst and phagocytic activity, cell morphology, and gene expression were analysed. The aqueous extract reduced respiratory burst and phagocytic capacity in activated leucocytes and was associated with morphological signs of cell activation. It also down-regulated crel and casp9 expression. These results provide a comparative view of the in vitro bioactivity of different traditional preparations of arnica and show that their biological effects strongly depend on the solvent used and the concentration tested, providing initial experimental information on their cellular effects in fish.