Epistemic Transformations: Large Language Models and the Reconfiguration of Scholarly Knowledge Production
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
The rapid integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into academic research practices presents significant opportunities and challenges that extend beyond questions of efficiency to fundamental reconfigurations of scholarly knowledge production itself. This article provides a comprehensive, interdisciplinary examination of how these artificial intelligence systems are reshaping research workflows, epistemic practices, and the very categories through which we understand scholarship. Drawing on Science and Technology Studies, philosophy of science, philosophy of mind, research ethics, and scholarship from diverse global contexts, the analysis situates LLM integration within broader debates about technological mediation in knowledge production while attending to how these technologies may transform the foundational concepts of authorship, originality, and expertise. The article examines empirical evidence regarding adoption patterns, critically assesses both benefits and risks—including concerns about epistemic quality, research integrity, equity, and the preservation of scholarly competencies—while engaging systematically with counterarguments and alternative perspectives. Particular attention is given to disciplinary variation through detailed case studies, global and linguistic dimensions drawing on non-Anglophone scholarship, and temporal dynamics of adoption. A multi-level framework for responsible integration is proposed, offering operationalized guidance for individual researchers, institutions, publishers, and policymakers, alongside examination of coordinated governance mechanisms. The framework addresses the fundamental tension between leveraging technological capabilities and maintaining the epistemic virtues that underpin trustworthy scholarship, while acknowledging that these very virtues may themselves be undergoing transformation. This analysis contributes to ongoing debates about the future of academic knowledge production by providing theoretically grounded, empirically informed, and practically oriented guidance for navigating this transformative technological moment.