Bilateral Strategic Partnerships Between States as a Foundational Pillar for Strengthening International Relations: A Systematic Analytical Study (2015–2025)
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Amid the accelerating geopolitical transformations reshaping international order in the first quarter of the twenty-first century, bilateral strategic partnerships (BSPs) have emerged as a pivotal diplomatic instrument and an indispensable mechanism for interstate cooperation. Despite their proliferating deployment in diplomatic discourse, BSPs remain conceptually undertheorized, with significant lacunae in the systematic comparative analysis of their structural foundations, multidimensional functions, and resilience under shifting geopolitical conditions. This study addresses these gaps by pursuing three interrelated objectives: (1) constructing a rigorous conceptual framework that distinguishes BSPs from cognate forms of international cooperation, (2) identifying and analyzing the core dimensions and enabling conditions that underpin successful partnerships, and (3) evaluating leading contemporary models through structured comparative case analysis.Employing a qualitative multi-case research design grounded in thematic analysis and structured focused comparison, the study examines four paradigmatic BSPs—Franco-German, U.S.–Japan, Sino-Russian, and Saudi–U.S.—drawing on policy documents, treaty texts, institutional records, and peer-reviewed scholarship from 2015 to 2025. Findings reveal that BSP durability is contingent upon four interdependent pillars: value-interest alignment, structural economic complementarity, sustained political leadership, and robust institutional architecture. The study further identifies a typological spectrum ranging from deeply institutionalized, norm-convergent partnerships to strategically expedient, structurally fragile alignments. The paper concludes that BSPs constitute not merely bilateral instruments but systemic building blocks for a more stable and polycentric international order, while cautioning against the inflationary and ceremonial deployment of the concept.