Field Evidence for Asymmetric Regulation of Wheat Streak Mosaic Virus and Triticum Mosaic Virus Across the Wheat–Wheat Curl Mite Interface

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Wheat streak mosaic (WSM), historically attributed to wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) and transmitted by the wheat curl mite (WCM; Aceria tosichella), remains a major cause of yield loss in the Texas High Plains. In recent years, Triticum mosaic virus (TriMV), also transmitted by WCM, has emerged as an increasingly important component of the WSM disease complex. Under field conditions, TriMV is most frequently detected in mixed infections with WSMV. Management of WSM relies primarily on resistant cultivars carrying genes such as Wsm1 or Wsm2. Although synergistic interactions between WSMV and TriMV have been documented under controlled conditions, their dynamics during natural field infections—particularly during the latent phase between initial infection and symptom development—remain poorly understood. Moreover, the extent to which host genotype influences virus–virus interactions and vector acquisition dynamics in the field has not been fully resolved. Replicated field trials conducted over two growing seasons were used to quantify temporal accumulation patterns and relative ratios of WSMV and TriMV in susceptible (TAM 304) and resistant cultivars differing in resistance source (BT [Wsm1] and Joe [Wsm2]) under natural disease spread. WSMV remained the predominant virus in mixed infections across cultivars, sampling times, and disease stages. However, as plants aged and entered senescence, WSMV titers declined more rapidly than TriMV titers, resulting in a progressive reduction in the WSMV-to-TriMV ratio. From early in-fection through disease development, the Wsm1 cultivar (BT) consistently supported significantly lower TriMV accumulation than the Wsm2 cultivar (Joe), providing a mechanistic explanation for the comparatively stronger disease suppression associated with WSM. Mites feeding on BT also acquired lower TriMV titers. Although viral con-centrations in wheat tissue were strongly correlated with those detected in feeding mites, substantial differences in plant-level WSMV-to-TriMV ratios among cultivars were not mirrored within the vector. These findings indicate that while host resistance regulates absolute virus accumulation, vector-associated factors may influence the relative pro-portions of viruses detected following acquisition, with important implications for WSM epidemiology and resistance deployment in field systems.

Article activity feed