Integrating the ICF and the F-Words Framework to Support Family-Centered Pediatric Care for Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Narrative Review

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Family-centered care is a core principle of contemporary pediatric health and rehabilitation, particularly for children with neurodevelopmental disorders. Con-ceptual frameworks that emphasize functioning, participation, and contextual factors are essential for operationalizing this approach in clinical practice. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the F-words framework are widely referenced models aligned with these principles; however, their practical integration within family-centered pediatric care remains challenging. The objective of this narrative review was to examine how the ICF and the F-words framework are ap-plied in pediatric neurorehabilitation, to identify conceptual and practical limitations, and to explore strategies that may enhance their use in family-centered care. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. English-language publications published between 2005 and 2025 were identified using keywords related to the ICF, the F-words framework, neurode-velopmental disorders, childhood disability, and cerebral palsy. Eligible sources in-cluded original research articles, systematic, scoping, and narrative reviews, valida-tion studies, expert reports, and clinical practice guidelines. Articles were selected based on relevance to family-centered pediatric care and the integration of the ICF and F-words frameworks. Results: A short summary of the article’s main findings Thir-ty-one publications were included, representing a broad range of theoretical, empirical, and clinical perspectives. The findings indicate increasing use of both the ICF and the F-words framework in pediatric rehabilitation and family-centered care. However, persistent challenges were identified, including conceptual ambiguity, overlap be-tween frameworks, limited standardization, difficulties in outcome measurement, and inconsistent involvement of families in clinical decision-making. Conclusions: The ICF and the F-words framework offer complementary strengths for supporting fami-ly-centered pediatric care. A structured, integrated approach may improve shared de-cision-making, communication with families, and participation-focused care. Further methodological refinement and practice-oriented guidance are needed to support their consistent and effective implementation in everyday clinical settings.

Article activity feed