Soft Tissue Reconstruction Does Not Compromise Infection Control in Chronic Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treated with Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty Despite Increasing Complexity
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
The role of soft tissue reconstruction in infection control of knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with a two-stage exchange strategy remains controversial. This retrospective observational study analysed consecutive patients with chronic knee PJI managed with a two-stage protocol between 2010 and 2023, comparing outcomes between cases requiring flap-based soft tissue reconstruction and those achieving primary closure. A total of 118 patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included. Forty patients (33.9%) required formal coverage, including 25 pedicled medial gastrocnemius flaps and 15 anterolateral thigh (ALT) microsurgical free flaps. Reconstructed patients showed greater baseline complexity, with a higher number of previous surgical pro-cedures (3.03 vs 2.08; p = 0.0057) and a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus and sinus tracts. Despite this, infection control was superior compared with non-reconstructed cases (100% vs 88.5%; p = 0.029). Within the reconstruction group, both pedicled and micro-surgical techniques achieved complete infection eradication; however, ALT flaps were associated with higher complication rates (53.3%), with partial flap necrosis being the most frequent event. The use of microsurgical reconstruction increased progressively over time, reflecting growing reconstructive complexity.