Decoding CAPA: A Comparative Study of Aspicu, Isham, and Eortc Criteria in Critical COVID-19 Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is a frequent and severe complication among critically ill patients with COVID-19 (1). The absence of a clear diagnostic gold standard and the multiplicity of proposed definitions (EORTC/MSG (2), AspICU (3), and ISHAM (4)) complicate its diagnosis and therefore the early treatment of these patients. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the performance of the EORTC/MSG, AspICU, and ISHAM classifications in diagnosing CAPA among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients and to assess their correlations with clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, monocentric study including all adult COVID-19 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation admitted in the ICUs of CHU-Charleroi Chimay between March 2020 and December 2021. Patients were classified on probable or possible CAPA according to EORTC/MSG, AspICU, and ISHAM criteria. Demographics, comorbidities, management, and outcomes were compared across groups. Results: 405 patients were included during the four waves. The mean incidence of probable or possible CAPA during the study period varied widely: 6.1% with EORTC/MSG, 9.7% with AspICU, and 15.1% with ISHAM criteria. The distribution of aspergillosis cases across the four COVID-19 waves varied depending on the classification system used, especially for the AspICU and ISHAM criteria (from 7.6 to 11.9 % at the third wave for AspICU criteria and 12.3 to 18.6 % for the ISHAM criteria at the fourth wave). These variations could be secondary to changes in management practices of COVID-19 disease, particularly the use of corticosteroids. ICU mortality was significantly higher among patients with positive Aspergillus culture (50 compared to 40.5% in patients with negative culture), Conclusion: The choice of CAPA diagnostic criteria has a major impact on incidence estimates and patient management. Variations among diagnostic criteria emphasize the need for a unified and pragmatic definition. Prospective validation of CAPA definitions, integrating multiple mycological criteria, is urgently needed to guide clinical decision-making and antifungal therapy. Keywords: COVID-19, pulmonary aspergillosis, CAPA, AspICU, ISHAM, EORTC, invasive fungal infections, critical care.

Article activity feed