Perceived Readiness and Ability to Socially Distance during the Early COVID-19 Epidemic in a U.S. Metropolitan Area: Implications for Local Public Health Preparedness
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background/Objectives: Nonpharmaceutical interventions such as social distancing are critical for controlling infectious disease transmission during emerging epidemics, particularly when pharmaceutical countermeasures are limited or unevenly available. During the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, public health strategies emphasized individual compliance, yet adherence varied widely. Empirical evidence remains limited on how individuals integrate influences across individual, interpersonal, and community levels when determining their ability and readiness to socially distance. This study examined how residents evaluated, prioritized, and experienced multi-level factors shaping perceived ability and readiness to practice social distancing during the early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of adults (≥18 years) residing in St. Louis City and St. Louis County, Missouri, between April and July 2020. Participants selected and ranked individual/interpersonal and community-level factors influencing social distancing and provided open-ended explanations of their choices. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively to assess selection frequency and ranking priority. Qualitative responses were analyzed using iterative thematic coding to examine how participants interpreted and combined these factors. Results: The analytic sample included 1,692 respondents. At the individual/interpersonal level, family and friends’ distancing behavior (58.9%), desire for in-person interaction (52.4%), and personal risk of COVID-19 (48.9%) were frequently selected, while personal risk, caring for others, and ability to work from home were most often ranked as highest priority. At the community level, others’ distancing in public spaces (66.2%), availability of COVID-19 testing (58.9%), and businesses’ ability to ensure distancing and sanitation (57.2%) were most frequently selected, with epidemic severity, testing availability, and treatment availability ranked as most influential. Qualitative findings indicated that respondents experienced these influences as interconnected, integrating personal and relational risk, local epidemic conditions, healthcare access, visible community norms, and employer policies. Conclusions: Perceived ability and readiness to practice social distancing emerge from interdependent social and structural conditions rather than isolated individual motivations. Public health responses to emerging infectious diseases may be more effective when individual-level guidance is complemented by accessible testing and treatment, supportive workplace policies, and community environments that visibly reinforce protective behaviors.