Virialisation as Viscosity: Deriving the ITP Cosmological Memory Kernel from TNG300

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Non--Markovian extensions of $\Lambda$CDM model the backreaction of nonlinear structure on the background expansion through a memory kernel that relates deviations in the effective expansion rate to a structural source built from small--scale dynamics. In the Infinite Transformation Principle (ITP) framework this is written as a Volterra equation for the deviation $\delta H^2(t)$ of the effective expansion rate from the Friedmann prediction, with a kernel $K_{\rm ITP}$ and a structural source $\Sigma(t)$. In previous work, $K_{\rm ITP}$ was introduced phenomenologically and constrained by fits to $H(z)$ and growth data, leading to the criticism that the kernel was not derived from first principles.This paper takes a first step toward a simulation--based derivation. The TNG300-1 simulation is coarse--grained into a $4\times4\times4$ grid of $\sim 50\,{\rm Mpc}/h$ domains. For each snapshot between $z\simeq 2$ and $z=0$ the analysis constructs a domain--averaged velocity--dispersion source $\Sigma(t)\equiv\langle\sigma_v^2\rangle_D$ and an effective expansion--rate deviation $\delta H^2(t)\equiv H_{\rm eff}^2(t)-H_{\rm FRW}^2(t)$ in $(\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}})^2$. The relation between these two time series is then modeled as a causal Volterra convolution with an exponential kernel, \[ \delta H^2(t_n) \simeq \sum_{m\le n} K(t_n-t_m)\,\Sigma(t_m)\,\Delta t_m, \qquad K(\Delta t)=A\,\exp(-\Delta t/\tau). \]The best--fit kernel is negative and short--ranged. Using ten snapshots and 64 domains per snapshot, the analysis finds $\tau \simeq 0.51\,\mathrm{Gyr}$, $A\simeq -2.17\times 10^{-3}$, and a 90\% memory horizon $T_{\rm mem}\simeq 1.17\,\mathrm{Gyr}$, with an integrated drag strength $\int_0^\infty K(\Delta t)\,{\rm d}\Delta t = A\tau \simeq -1.1\times 10^{-3}$. A fit that excludes the final $z=0$ snapshot yields $\tau\simeq 0.37\,\mathrm{Gyr}$, $A\simeq -2.82\times 10^{-3}$ and $T_{\rm mem}\simeq 0.86\,\mathrm{Gyr}$ with a similar drag strength, showing that $A\tau$ is more stable than $A$ or $\tau$ taken individually. The negative amplitude implies that increasing $\Sigma(t)$ drives $\delta H^2(t)<0$, so that virialisation acts as a viscosity: as domains heat up dynamically, the effective expansion rate is pulled below the Friedmann value.To connect this structural source to observations, the same velocity--dispersion proxy is measured in SDSS~DR8 groups and compared with the TNG300 domains. In SDSS the scaling $\sigma^2\propto M^{0.21}$ with a moderate correlation ($r\simeq 0.31$) reflects the familiar Faber--Jackson/Fundamental Plane tilt, showing that $\sigma^2$ is a biased tracer of the potential well. In TNG300 domains the structural source obeys $\sigma_v^2\propto M^{1.07}$ with a strong correlation ($r\simeq 0.76$), as expected when probing the three--dimensional potential depth of fixed comoving volumes at cluster and supercluster scales.A minimal repeat of the kernel measurement and structural--source scaling on the higher--resolution TNG50-1 simulation---restricted to six late--time snapshots---confirms the same qualitative behaviour: a negative, sub--Gyr kernel and a steep, tightly correlated $\sigma^2$--$M$ relation. Together these results provide a concrete example of a scale--dependent cosmological memory kernel: on $\sim 50\,{\rm Mpc}/h$ domains, virialisation imprints a short, Gyr--scale negative kernel; on horizon scales, previous phenomenological ITP fits require an effectively long--range kernel. The short kernels measured here are naturally interpreted as local, simulation--level realizations of the ``information drag'' that appears as a long memory component in the background expansion.

Article activity feed