Health Information Technology Capital Intensity and Hospital Financial Performance: Evidence from U.S. Hospitals, 2018–2023

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: U.S. hospitals continue to invest in digital infrastructure, yet evidence on how health information technology (HIT) capital investment relates to financial performance, particularly after COVID-19, remains mixed.Objective: To estimate associations between HIT capital intensity and hospital profitability from 2018 to 2023, assess nonlinearity, and test whether associations differed during the COVID-19 years. Methods: Using the RAND HCRIS hospital panel (3,480 hospital-year observations from HIT-reporting hospitals, 2018–2023), we defined HIT capital intensity as HIT-designated capital stock divided by total assets. Primary analyses estimated year-specific regressions with HIT-intensity quintiles and spline specifications for nonlinearity, adjusting for hospital size (log total assets) and teaching status. Pooled models incorporated year fixed effects and HIT-intensity interactions with a COVID indicator (2020–2021). Sensitivity analyses included alternative winsorization (5th/95th percentile), hospital-fixed effects, and placebo tests using non-HIT fixed-asset intensity.Results: Reporter rates ranged from 24.6% (2018; 545/2,212) to 19.4% (2023; 982/5,063). In year-specific quintile models, the highest HIT-intensity quintile (Q5) was associated with lower winsorized total margin versus Q1 in 2018 (β = −0.055; p = 0.008), 2019 (β = −0.042; p = 0.016), and 2023 (β = −0.034; p = 0.010), with weaker estimates in 2020–2022. In pooled interaction models, higher-intensity hospitals exhibited a lower margin gap outside COVID years (e.g., Q5: β = −0.041; p < 0.001) with partial attenuation during COVID (Q5×COVID: β = 0.032; p = 0.073). Hospital fixed-effects estimates for quintiles were not statistically significant (Q5: β = −0.015; p = 0.438). A pooled 5/95 winsorization robustness check remained negative for Q5 (β = −0.029; p < 0.001). Placebo analyses showed similar patterns for non-HIT fixed assets (Q5: β = −0.032; p = 0.006). Conclusions: Higher HIT capital intensity is associated with lower profitability at the upper end of the intensity distribution in some years, with suggestive attenuation during COVID-19. However, the fixed-effects and placebo results are consistent with time-invariant confounding or broader capital-intensity dynamics rather than HIT-specific causal effects. Policies targeting financially constrained hospitals may help sustain digital investment while protecting financial stability.

Article activity feed