Comparative Analysis of Impression Techniques: Digital Versus Conventional in the Dental Office

The selection of the impression technique is an essential process that must be carried out according to the needs of each patient and the complexity of each clinical case. Impression methods have specific advantages, and their selection can directly influence the quality of the final result, the stability and long-term success of the prosthetic restoration, but also the patient's comfort. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare conventional and digital impression techniques, highlighting the advantages and limitations of each and their clinical implications. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted based on the results of an online questionnaire comprising 16 items, distributed to dentists in the Oltenia region of Romania. The collected data were statistically analyzed, and correlations among variables were established. Results: The study highlights a high acceptance rate of digital impression techniques among dentists in Oltenia, with preference among doctors from urban areas and the 36-45-year age group. Digital impression techniques are associated with superior clinical accuracy, increased patient comfort, and high levels of professional satisfaction despite their high initial costs. The results confirm that direct experience with digital technologies significantly influences doctors' willingness to adopt and recommend this method. Conclusions: Although digital impression techniques are increasingly adopted, conventional techniques remain indispensable in numerous clinical scenarios owing to their proven reliability and adaptability.