Enhancing Family Communication in the Intensive Care Unit Using a Co-Designed Informational Brochure: A Prospective Before–After Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Communication gaps contribute substantially to anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among relatives of critically ill patients. This study evaluated whether supplementing routine bedside meetings with a concise, co-designed informational brochure was associated with reduced psychological distress and improved satisfaction among family members in the intensive care unit (ICU). Materials and Methods: We conducted a single-centre prospective before–after observational study in a mixed medical–surgical ICU in Naples, Italy. Relatives of adult patients with an ICU length of stay >72 h completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Short Screening Scale for PTSD (SSS-PTSD) at ICU discharge. The pre-intervention phase enrolled 12 relatives (May–September 2018); following a co-design and staff training period, the post-intervention phase enrolled 23 relatives (April–October 2019). Primary outcomes were the prevalence of anxiety (HADS-A ≥8), depression (HADS-D ≥8), and probable PTSD (SSS-PTSD ≥4). Groups were compared using Fisher’s exact test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Results: Anxiety remained highly prevalent (100% pre vs. 95.7% post; p = 1.00). Depression severity decreased, with median HADS-D scores declining from 13 (IQR 10–18) to 9 (IQR 7–12) (p = 0.021), while the prevalence of HADS-D ≥8 was lower post-intervention (91.7% vs. 73.9%; p = 0.38). The prevalence of probable PTSD was numerically reduced from 58.3% to 30.4% (p = 0.116). Perceived comprehension improved (7.9 ± 1.1 vs. 8.6 ± 0.9; p = 0.037), whereas objective comprehension remained unchanged. Overall family satisfaction increased (FS-ICU-24: 66 ± 15 vs. 75 ± 12; p = 0.041). Staff depersonalization decreased from 35% to 10% (p = 0.048). Conclusions: In this real-world before–after study, integrating a low-cost, co-designed brochure into clinician–family communication was associated with reduced depressive symptom severity, a numerical reduction in PTSD prevalence, and improved satisfaction, without adverse effects on staff well-being. These findings support the use of structured written information in family-centred ICU care.

Article activity feed