A Generative AI-Based Framework for Proactive Quality Assurance and Auditing

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming quality management (QM) and auditing by expanding automation, supporting data-driven decisions, and enabling more personalized stakeholder interaction. However, its adoption also raises concerns related to system robustness, operational resilience, and regulatory compliance, including potential deviations from Critical-to-Quality (CTQ) requirements, gaps in traceability, and misalignment with established quality standards. This paper proposes a structured conceptual framework for proactive, generative AI-enabled QM and auditing, organized into three functional domains: supplier performance, in-process control, and post-market feedback. The framework shows how generative AI can: 1) strengthen supplier oversight via automated documentation and early risk identification; 2) improve in-process control through real-time anomaly detection and Statistical Process Control (SPC)–based triage; and 3) enhance post-market surveillance using predictive analytics for warranty clustering and prioritized Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) preparation. To ensure compliance and auditability, the framework incorporates policy-based constraints, human-in-the-loop checkpoints, and end-to-end digital traceability. Verification was performed through a proof-of-concept case study spanning discrete manufacturing and process-based production environments, comparing a conventional quality workflow with a generative AI-augmented alternative. Expert assessment indicated that the generative AI-assisted workflow achieved better performance on key criteria, including documentation completeness, defect detection, process stability, governance and time efficiency. The obtained results suggest that the proposed framework can support a shift from reactive quality control towards predictive and preventive improvement while preserving alignment with quality standards and organizational quality objectives.

Article activity feed