PT-Projected Projective Palatini Gravity: Two-Derivative Operator Basis, Admissible Equivalences, and a Local IR Residual

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

We study the local infrared content of four-dimensional Palatini gravity in the projective equivalence class, with the observable sector defined by a scalar PT projection. Restricting to a strictly local, curvature-linear two-derivative truncation, we (i) give an explicit and complete basis for all PT-even, projectively admissible bulk scalars in the trace/scalar channel and (ii) define the admissible equivalence relations that preserve the posture, including IR closure of the matter sector and tensorsector locking diagnostics used as auditable admissibility tests. A key structural consequence of full one-form projective invariance, \( \Gamma^\lambda{}_{\mu\nu}\to \Gamma^\lambda{}_{\mu\nu}+\delta^\lambda_{\mu}\xi_\nu \), is the appearance of a projectively invariant residue one-form \( \mathcal{T}_\mu \equiv T_\mu-A_\mu \), where \( A_\mu \) is a compensator transforming as \( A_\mu\to A_\mu+3\xi_\mu \). We then prove a conditional local no-go: within the closed two-derivative operator class and modulo admissible equivalences, there exists no reformulation that removes \( \mathcal{T}_\mu \) from the bulk dynamics in the observable trace/scalar channel while simultaneously (a) preserving IR closure of the minimal matter-coupling posture and (b) preserving the tensor-sector locking diagnostics (in particular luminality). Any attempted bulk removal is necessarily exhausted by a small set of controlled failure modes, including collapse to a trivial residue-free branch, departure from the admissible operator class / IR non-closure, or locking failure. On admissible domains one may restrict to longitudinal representatives, where a scalar \( \epsilon \) parameterizes the physical longitudinal content of \( \mathcal{T}_\mu \); \( \epsilon \) is not a compensator and cannot be eliminated as a pure gauge artifact. We summarize the exclusion logic in a compact diagnostic table and provide a minimal counterexample on standard backgrounds, thereby making the local IR residual (“IR island”) operationally auditable.

Article activity feed