Inverting the Dimensional Hierarchy: Advocating for a 4D-Native Framework for Quantum Geometry

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The standard mathematical framework of differential topology reveals a profound peculiarity: smooth structures on 4-manifolds are wild, unclassifiable, and form an uncountably infinite set, while in all other dimensions they are either unique or finitely classifiable. This presents a fundamental obstacle to constructing a quantum theory of gravity via a path integral sum over geometries as the configuration space becomes intractably complex. Crucially, this mathematical wildness is not a mere curiosity but a diagnostic signal that our dimension-agnostic mathematical framework is fundamentally inadequate for describing quantum spacetime in our 4-dimensional universe. We argue that this impasse signals not a pathology of 4-dimensional spacetime, but a critical flaw in our mathematical starting point. We propose a radical inversion of priorities: instead of seeking to tame 4D wildness within a dimension-agnostic formalism, we should construct a new mathematical framework whose axioms are explicitly designed so that 4-dimensional spacetime emerges as its unique, natural, and tame solution. The price for this 4D simplicity is that other dimensionalities may appear ill-defined or trivial within the new framework, a price we argue is not only acceptable but necessary for a physical theory of our universe. We outline the philosophical and formal principles of such a 4D-native approach and discuss its embodiment in existing pre-geometric quantum gravity programs where smooth geometry emerges from more fundamental substrates.

Article activity feed