An Adverse Outcome Resulting from an Aftermarket Modification of a Suspension Seat: A Sentinel Health Event Investigation
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
In a sentinel health event investigation of a back disorder claim, the vibration exposure and ergonomic function of a modified suspension seat were assessed. (1) Background: In a forensic occupational injury investigation an after-market altered operator seat in a railroad rail-track tamper machine was evaluated. (2) Methods: Detailed whole-body vibration (WBV) exposure measurements were conducted according to current applicable technical standards and guidelines (i.e., ISO 2631-1; 1997) on a 09-16 DYNACAT Continuous Action Tamper with Stabilizer during routine track repair services. The modified Grammer Mfg. suspension operator seat was evaluated for performance and ergonomic features (i.e., adjustability, posture, and suspension quality); (3) Results: The tested seat appeared to underperform and was overloaded with the aftermarket control devices, attachments and modifications. The suspension system's end-stopper was damaged. The seat system had excessive play and wobbles; it was not firmly braced and attached. The vector sum (av) results ranged from 0.26 m/s² (no tamping) to maximal 0.55 m/s² (tamping). The seat transfer (SEAT) analysis showed magnification of vibration input and variable performance of the suspension depending on operational tasks. (4) Conclusions: The modified suspension seat underperformed and seemed to magnify and worsen the vibration, jolts and shock exposures of the seated operator. The heavy and bulky seat modifications likely limited the suspension function. The malfunctioning seat was more likely than not a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of the spinal disorders for the injured machine operator.