Integrative Vitamin D-Inflammatory-Coagulation Biomarker Index Predicts COVID-19 Severity: Development and Validation of the Vitamin D Inflammatory Burden Score (VDIBS)

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Vitamin D deficiency is common in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and as-sociates with increased severity. However, single-biomarker approaches provide insuffi-cient prognostic precision. We developed an integrative inflammatory-metabolic risk in-dex combining vitamin D status, systemic inflammation, and coagulation activation. Methods: Prospective cohort study of 512 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (September 2022–December 2023) with serum 25(OH)D3 measurement at admission. Primary analy-sis (N=301) included patients with complete inflammatory marker data (CRP, ferritin, D-dimer, LDH). The Vitamin D Inflammatory Burden Score (VDIBS) integrated: (1) vita-min D tier (deficient 75: 0), (2) inflammation score (CRP ≥100, ferritin ≥1000, IL-6 ≥50 each +1 point; 0–3 total), and (3) coagulation score (D-dimer ≥1000, LDH ≥6 each +1 point; 0–2 total). IL-6 measurement was available in 48 patients (9.4% of cohort); all other components were measured in the primary analysis population (N=301). Outcomes were severe COVID-19, ICU admission, and mortality. Predictive performance was compared across four multi-variate models. Results: Mean vitamin D was 63.4±33.2 nmol/L (68.1% deficient). Severe disease occurred in 386 patients (75.4%), ICU admission in 30 (5.9%), and mortality in 14 (2.7%). VDIBS risk stratification showed: low-risk (VDIBS 0–2) n=178, 8.4% severe; moderate-risk (3–5) n=245, 45.7% severe; high-risk (6–8) n=89, 78.6% severe (χ²=142.3, p< 0.001). VDIBS predicted se-vere disease with AUC 0.78 (95% CI 0.74–0.82), equivalent to more complex multivariate models (AUC 0.82, p=0.08) but with superior clinical simplicity. In stratified analyses, VDIBS showed robust discrimination independent of season, age, or sex (all interaction p>0.05), supporting generalizability. Conclusions: VDIBS provides bedside-implementable risk stratification integrating vita-min D-dependent immune regulation, systemic inflammation, and coagulation activa-tion. This composite approach offers practical tool for treatment intensity escalation and potential therapeutic target for vitamin D repletion in severe COVID-19.

Article activity feed