Reliability Assessment of the Infrastructure Leakage Index for a Single DMA Using High-Resolution AMI Water Meter Data

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

This study presents an analysis of the Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI) variability for two District Metered Areas (DMAs) in the Silesian Region (Poland), based on 2024 data. The objective of the study was to evaluate whether high-frequency AMI data can be used to reliably identify and remove distorted measurement periods, thereby improving the credibility of the annual ILI value for each individual DMA. ILIT values were calculated for daily, weekly, and monthly intervals using synchronized hourly data from an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) system and water network monitoring platforms. A key methodological advantage was the use of fully synchronous inflow–outflow–consumption data, enabling diagnostic reconstruction of hourly water balances and validation of the representativeness of data segments used for ILIT estimation. The study applied statistical measures of variability (standard deviation, variance, coefficient of variation) and graphical methods (histograms, boxplots) to evaluate ILIT behavior across time resolutions. Rather than comparing leakage performance between DMAs—which is performed exclusively using normalized indicators such as ILI—the analysis examined how hourly diagnostic information explains short-term distortions in the ILI and how filtering such periods affects the stability of the annual value for each DMAs. The results confirm that ILIT interpretation is highly dependent on temporal resolution. Daily data is more responsive to anomalies and operational events, while monthly data provides more stable values suitable for benchmarking. The findings demonstrate that daily and hourly data should be used diagnostically to detect non-representative periods, whereas monthly aggregation provides the most robust basis for reporting and inter-DMA comparison. Overall, the study proposes a practical procedure for ILI validation using AMI data and demonstrates its application on two real DMAs.

Article activity feed