Targeting Overtreatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in the Emergency Department: Results from a Quasi-Experimental Intervention Programme based on Education and Audit

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is frequently overtreated in emergency departments (ED), contributing to antimicrobial resistance without improving clinical outcomes. Rapid decision-making and high patient turnover in the ED increase the risk of unnecessary antibiotic use. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in the ED of a tertiary hospital in Barcelona, Spain, from January 2024 to June 2025. The intervention included targeted education for ED staff and daily audit-feedback on antibiotic prescriptions for suspected ASB. Outcomes were compared with a six-month pre-intervention period. The primary outcome was 30-day return visit to the ED for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) with the same microbiological isolate. Secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality, overall UTI return visit to the ED, antimicrobial consumption (Daily Defined Dose/1,000 admissions), and urine culture requests. Results: A total of 130 patients in the pre-intervention period and 127 patients in the intervention period were included. In the intervention period, antibiotic discontinuation was recommended in 96 (75.6%) patients; acceptance rate was 29.2%. Despite limited acceptance, antimicrobial consumption declined, with cefalosporins reduced by 21% and carbapenems by 24%. Urine culture requests fell by 16.1%, and uropathogen isolates decreased by 15.9%. Clinical outcomes were similar between both periods: 30-day return visit to the EDs for UTI with the same isolate dropped from 6.2% to 1.6% (p-value=0,103), overall UTI return visit to the EDs from 8.5% to 4.7% (p-value=0.316), and 30-day mortality remained stable (6.2% vs. 3.9%, p-value=0.571), no statistically significant differences across all variables. Conclusions: This program reduced inappropriate antibiotic use and unnecessary urine testing in the ED without compromising patient safety. These results highlight educational and audit-feedback intervention as a safe, practical, and impactful antimicrobial stewardship strategy in high-pressure clinical settings as the ED.

Article activity feed