Beyond Categorical Perception: Gradient Lexical Tone Processing Revealed by Visual Analog Scale

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose: While the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) has revealed gradient perception in segmental speech sounds, its application to lexical tones, a critical yet understudied suprasegmental feature, has been absent. This study investigated lexical tone categorization using VAS, directly comparing it with traditional two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC). Method: Eighty-four native speakers categorized an 11-step F0 continuum from Mandarin Tone 1 to Tone 2 in both tasks. Four-parameter logistic functions yielded slope (categorization sharpness) and response variability. Within-category sensitivity (Δ) was quantified from VAS responses.Results: Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed significantly shallower slopes (p < .001, r = .76) and lower variability (p < .001, r = .87) in VAS versus 2AFC. One-sample t-tests confirmed listeners discriminated fine-grained differences within categories, with Δ reliably exceeding zero (left: M = 0.0335, t(270) = 8.89, p < .001; right: M = 0.0256, t(316) = 8.38, p < .001). Crucially, slope and response variability were weakly correlated in VAS (ρ = .27, p < .05) but strongly negatively correlated in 2AFC (ρ = -.67, p < .001). Moreover, response variability correlated significantly across tasks (ρ = .40, p < .001), while slopes did not. Conclusion: These findings provide the direct evidence for gradient perception at the suprasegmental level, further establishing VAS as a sensitive tool for uncovering the nature of speech categorization. The dissociation between task-dependent gradiency and stable response variability helps reconcile apparent conflicts in the categorical perception literature, suggesting that these conflicts may stem from methodological constraints rather than genuine theoretical disagreements.

Article activity feed