Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Strategies in Catastrophic High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Analysis

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

High-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition characterized by he-modynamic instability, often leading to catastrophic outcomes such as cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with high-risk PE at a single tertiary center between 2018 and 2024. Catastrophic PE was de-fined as high-risk PE with hemodynamic collapse, including cardiac arrest and/or the requirement for high-dose vasopressors. Data on clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed. Catastrophic PE accounted for 59% of cases. Systemic throm-bolysis was the most frequent reperfusion strategy (67%), while catheter-directed therapies (35.4%) and VA-ECMO (11.4%) were used selectively. Despite aggressive management, catastrophic PE exhibited significantly higher mortality rates at 7 days (40%) and 30 days (49%) compared to non-catastrophic cases (9% and 12.5%, respectively). These patients also showed higher rates of multiorgan failure and required more invasive support. This study underscores the importance of early recognition and tailored treatment strategies for catastrophic PE, highlighting its distinct clinical presentation and worse outcomes compared to non-catastrophic high-risk PE. Further research is essential to refine treatment protocols and improve survival in this critically ill population, emphasizing the utility of a standardized classification to enhance clinical management and research consistency.

Article activity feed