Comparison of Cardiorespiratory Effects of Two Balanced Anesthesia Protocols in Baboons (Papio hamadryas) Undergoing Laparoscopic Salpingectomy

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Laparoscopic salpingectomy is a minimally invasive surgery that requires careful anesthetic management due to the effects of intra-abdominal gas insufflation. In this retrospective study, baboons (Papio hamadryas) were treated with two induction protocols: medetomidine–ketamine (MK; n = 16) and medetomidine–tiletamine–zolazepam (MZ; n = 12) via intramuscular injection. A laryngeal mask (LMA) was used for airway management and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in 100% oxygen. For statistical analysis, the following parameters were analyzed via two-way ANOVA: heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure (SAP, DAP, and MAP), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) recorded five minutes before pneumoperitoneum (PREP), after abdominal insufflation (PP1), at 10 (PP2) and 20 (PP3) minutes post-insufflation, and 5 min after pneumoperitoneum interruption (POSTP). HR and RR were statistically significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the MK group compared to the MZ group at all time points of the study. EtCO2 was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the MZ group at PP2, PP3, and POSTP time points. The incidence of hypotension was significantly greater in the MZ group (45.5%) compared to the MK group (6.25%). Hypercapnia was observed in all baboons sedated with the MZ protocol compared to 12.5% of the MK group. As a result, the MK protocol provided greater cardiorespiratory stability during laparoscopic surgery.

Article activity feed