Comparison of Cardiorespiratory Effects of Two Balanced Anaesthesia Protocols in Baboons (<em>Papio hamadryas</em>) Undergoing Laparoscopic Salpingectomy

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Laparoscopic salpingectomy is a mini-invasive surgery that requires careful anaesthesiologic management due to impact of pneumoperitoneum. In this retrospective study baboons (Papio Hamadryas) were treated with two sedative protocols: medetomidine-ketamine (MK; n=14) or medetomidine-tiletamine-zolazepam (MZ; n=12) via intramuscular injection. A laryngeal mask (LMA) was used for airway management and anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane. For statistical analysis were considered and analysed via two-way ANOVA: heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure (SAP, DAP, MAP), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO₂) and peripheral saturation (SpO₂) recorded five minutes before pneumoperitoneum (PREP), immediately after abdominal insufflation (PP1), at 10 (PP2), 20 (PP3) minutes post-insufflation and 5 minutes after pneumoperitoneum interruption (POSTP). HR and RR were statistically significantly higher (p &lt; 0.05) in MK group compared to MZ group at all time points of the study. EtCO₂ was significantly higher (p &lt; 0.05) in MZ group at PP2, PP3, and POSTP time points. The incidence of hypotension was significantly greater in MZ group (45.5%) compared to MK group (6.25%). Hypercapnia was observed in all baboons sedated with MZ protocol compared to 12.5% of MK group. As a result, MK protocol provides greater cardiorespiratory stability during laparoscopic surgery.

Article activity feed