The Role of Prior HBV Infection and Resistance Mutations on the Efficacy of 3TC/DTG as a Maintenance Therapy

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Lamivudine/dolutegravir (3TC/DTG) is effective and safe for most people with HIV infection (PWH) who are virologically suppressed, but specific individual’s characteristics, such as previous detection of archived resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) to 3TC and prior HBV infection, could represent a risk for virological failure (VF). We conducted a retrospective monocentric cohort study to assess rates and predictors of treatment discontinuation (TD) and VF in PWH switched to 3TC/DTG after reaching virological suppression (HIV-RNA<50 cp/mL). Overall, 188 PWH were included. Over 5145 patient-years follow-up (PYFU), 16 (8.5%) PWH experienced TD (2.87 per 1000 PYFU), whereas over 5082 PYFU, 8 (4.3%) experienced VF (1.45 per 1000 PYFU). Probabilities of TD and VF were 1.3%, 2.8%, 7.5%, 12.9%, 34.5% and 0.6%, 2.7%, 2.7%, 4.2%, 22.3% after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years respectively. Independent predictors of VF were a detectable baseline HIV-RNA of 20-49 copies/ml (versus<20 copies/ml, aHR 9.11, 95 % CI 1.05-79.40; p= 0.046), and a higher GSS-score for 3TC (per 10 points more, aHR 1.57, 95 % CI 1.07-2.29; p= 0.023), with a borderline significance for anti-HBcAg positive serostatus (versus negative, aHR 8.88, 95 % CI 0.89-88.45; p= 0.062). After adjustment for age and gender, those with anti-HBcAg positivity who switched from a tenofovir-containing regimen had the highest risk of VF (versus negative anti-HBcAg and no prior tenofovir use, aHR 15.06, 95% CI 1.40-161.38; p-value= 0.025).

Article activity feed