Coronary Heart Disease: Implementation Of Imaging Modalities To Optimize Cost-Effectiveness

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background/Objectives: cardiovascular diseases remain the most significant health and economic challenge in Stable Economy Countries. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission to-mography (PET) has long been a cornerstone in the diagnosis and management of coro-nary heart disease (CHD). However, in an era of increasing healthcare costs and emergence of new imaging technologies, the cost-effectiveness of nuclear cardiology has come under critical evaluation and the implementation of different modalities of imaging need to be considerd. Methods: this review describe the characteristic of the two principal methods of economic analysis used to measure health benefits and presents an overview of the rele-vant trials published so far on the cost-effectiveness of different imaging modalities in the evaluation of CHD. Results: due to the great variability of data conditioned by facility availability, expertise, setting of patients (inpatients vs outpatients), healthcare systems, reimbursement, systems based on insurance company a definite cost effectiveness analysis cannot be obtain. Conclusions: a multimodalities approach seems to offer better perfor-mances both in clinical and in the economical analysis.

Article activity feed