Improving Intensive End-of-Life Care for Infants and Children: A Scoping Review of Intervention Elements
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background/objectives: High-quality pediatric critical care includes supporting children nearing the end-of-life (EOL) and their families. Cataloging existing interventions for children dying in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) establishes critical areas for future research. In this scoping review, we evaluated characteristics of PICU EOL in-terventions. Methods: A librarian guided a search of OVID Medline, CINAHL, OVID PsycINFO, OVID Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science, plus backwards and forwards reference searching. We included interprofessional interventions, defined as any sys-tematic change (e.g., educational programs, symptom management, electronic medical record, etc.), for children dying from any cause. Studies were independently screened by two reviewers. Data were extracted by one team member and reviewed by a second. We extracted intervention elements, contextual factors, and implementation barri-ers/facilitators and generated frequencies from qualitative coding. Results: Of 11,643 screened articles; 44 met inclusion criteria. Most were in neonatal ICUs (28/44, 64%) and general PICUs (10/44, 23%). Most interventions aimed to improve cli-nician knowledge (25/44; 57%), augment clinical structures and processes (11/44; 25%), or enhance communication (N=8/44; 18%). Common delivery methods included clinical practice changes (N=25/44; 57%; e.g. protocols, order sets [N=12]) and educational sessions (N=20/44; 45%). Outcomes included clinician knowledge (N=17/44; 39%), qualitative feedback (N=18/44; 41%), feasibility/acceptability (N=12/44; 27%), or treatment utilization (N=11/44; 25%). Few examined families’ mental health (N=3; 7%) or bereavement (N=2; 5%). Few reported implementation facilitators or barriers. Conclusions: Most included studies targeted clinician outcomes through education. De-signing, testing, and implementing interventions focused on family outcomes is a critical next step.