Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Early Breast Cancer: A Study on Response Rate and Toxicity

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is widely used in patients with high risk HER2-amplified (HER2+) or triple negative early breast cancer (TNBC). Advantages of NACT include allowing less extensive surgery, assessing response to treatment and guiding adjuvant therapy. NACT-related toxicities are common and can result in treatment alterations and hospitalisation, which may adversely impact outcomes. Aim: To assess NACT treatment in Hawke’s Bay (HB), New Zealand, by evaluating pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and toxicities of different regimens. Method: Data were retrospectively obtained from medical records of NACT patients. pCR rates were compared to results from previous literature. Toxicity was assessed by recording severe (grade 3 or above) toxicities, treatment-limiting toxicities (those leading to dose reductions, dose delays, early cessation), and hospitalisations for different NACT regimens. Results: A total of 71 NACT patients were included. pCR rates for HER2+ disease and TNBC were 19/45 (42%) and 8/24 (33%) respectively. The most common severe toxicities were diarrhoea, anaemia and febrile neutropaenia (all 16%) in FEC-D (5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide + docetaxel +/- carboplatin +/- immunotherapy) patients, neutropaenia (50%) in FEC-DH (FEC-D + trastuzumab +/- pertuzumab) patients and diarrhoea (38%) in TCH (docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab +/- pertuzumab) patients. Comparing treatment-limiting toxicity in FEC-DH vs TCH, 9/16 (56%) vs 13/21 (62%) had dose reduction, 2/16 (13%) vs 8/21 (38%) had dose delay, 1/16 (6%) vs 5/21(24%) had early cessation and 6/16 (38%) vs 13/21 (62%) were hospitalized respectively. Conclusion: NACT was associated with high rates of severe and treatment-limiting toxicity. Despite this, pCR rates were consistent with previous literature. With the caveat of small patient numbers, FEC-DH-based therapy was associated with fewer dosing delays, early cessations and hospitalisations compared with TCH-based therapy.

Article activity feed