The Goo That Binds Us: How Field Resonance Solves Neuroscience’s Binding Problem

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The binding problem represents one of neuroscience's most persistent challenges: how do distributed neural processes create unified conscious experience? This paper argues that the problem emerges from neuroscience's "prickly" bias toward discrete, computational approaches and dissolves when we embrace "gooey" electromagnetic field perspectives. Drawing on Alan Watts' philosophical dichotomy between "prickles" (precise, chopped-up particles) and "goo" (vague, continuous waves), we demonstrate how the EM field hypothesis (EFH) provides a natural solution to both spatial and temporal binding through cross-frequency coupling and field resonance mechanisms. Revolutionary new evidence from EEG research reveals that electromagnetic fields can entrain neural spike timing at thresholds as low as 0.74 mV/mm, establishing causal field-to-neuron communication. The strong EM field hypothesis, supported by recent ECoG findings showing broadband power increases that correlate more strongly with neural activity than oscillatory patterns, suggests that electromagnetic fields constitute the primary substrate of consciousness while neural firing serves mainly as an energy source. We suggest that myelination and ephaptic field effects coevolved as an integrated energy modulation system, with myelination evolving not merely for speed but to selectively shape electromagnetic field computation (analog rather than digital) in different brain regions, which shift in response to modulated energy inputs from myelinated fibers. The 5,000-fold speed advantage of ephaptic field propagation (50 km/s vs 10-100 m/s for spikes) scales to a potential 125 billion-fold information density advantage (5,000 to the third power), enabling the rapid integration necessary for unified consciousness. However, myelination's insulating properties create a fundamental trade-off: enhancing point-to-point transmission while dampening the local field integration that complex consciousness requires. Evolution solved this through sophisticated regional specialization, preserving most thalamocortical circuits unmyelinated to maintain field integration capacity, while using strategic myelination of long fibers to allow modulation of energy inputs across brain areas. The implications extend beyond solving a technical problem to recognizing that cognition and consciousness are fundamentally gooey rather than prickly—not made of discrete computational events but continuous electromagnetic field dynamics operating within coevolved myelinated neuroanatomical infrastructure.

Article activity feed