Voices of Researchers: Ethics and Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Inquiry

The rapid emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has sparked a growing debate about its ethical, methodological, and epistemological implications for qualitative research. This study aimed to examine and deeply understand researchers' perceptions regarding the use of GenAI tools in different phases of the qualitative research process. The study involved a sample of 214 researchers from diverse disciplinary areas, with publications indexed in Web of Science or Scopus that apply qualitative methods. Data collection was conducted using an open-ended questionnaire, and analysis was carried out using coding and thematic analysis procedures, which allowed us to identify patterns of perception, user experiences, and barriers. The findings show that, while GenAI is valued for its ability to optimize tasks such as corpus organization, initial coding, transcription, translation, and information synthesis, its implementation raises concerns regarding privacy, consent, authorship, the reliability of results, and the loss of interpretive depth. Furthermore, a dual ecosystem is observed, where some researchers already incorporate it, mainly generative text assistants like ChatGPT, while others have yet to use it or are unfamiliar with it. Overall, the results suggest that the most solid path is an assisted model, supported by clear ethical frameworks, adapted methodological guidelines, and critical training for responsible and humanistic use.