Psychological Profiles and Resilience in Family Caregivers of People with Dementia: A Latent Profile Analysis
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background/Objectives: Family caregivers of individuals with dementia frequently experience substantial psychological distress, yet their emotional responses are heterogeneous. Depression, anxiety and psychological well-being may co-occur in distinct patterns, and socio-economic resources such as education and income are often hypothesized to buffer caregiver distress. This study aimed to identify latent psychological profiles among dementia caregivers and to examine whether education and income moderate the association between affective symptoms and well-being. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 73 family caregivers of dementia patients attending the Neurology–Psychiatry Department of C.F.2 Clinical Hospital, Bucharest (November 2023–April 2024). Participants completed the PHQ-9 (depression), the COVI Anxiety Scale and Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales. Care recipients’ cognitive status was extracted from medical records using the MMSE. Gaussian Mixture Modeling was used for latent profile analysis (LPA). Between-profile differences were examined using one-way ANOVAs and Tukey post-hoc tests and Pearson correlations were used to assess associations between affective symptoms and psychological well-being, and examined whether education and income were associated with profile membership and psychological well-being. Results: LPA supported a three-profile solution: (1) lower depressive symptoms with moderate anxiety (33%), (2) severe combined depression and anxiety (18%) and (3) moderately severe depression with severe anxiety (49%). Profiles differed significantly in depressive symptom severity, whereas anxiety severity did not differ significantly across profiles. Caregivers in Profile 3 (moderately severe depression–severe anxiety) reported significantly higher overall psychological well-being than those in Profile 1 (moderate depression–moderate anxiety). In contrast, caregivers in Profile 2 (severe depression–severe anxiety), who exhibited the highest affective symptom burden, showed intermediate levels of overall well-being, with comparatively lower scores on specific dimensions such as purpose in life. Depressive symptoms were weakly but significantly associated with autonomy and self-acceptance, whereas anxiety symptoms showed no significant associations with psychological well-being. Education level and household income were not significantly associated with profile membership or psychological well-being. Conclusions: Family caregivers of individuals with dementia can be meaningfully described as forming three exploratory psychological profiles characterized by different configurations of depressive and anxiety symptoms. These findings indicate that caregiver distress does not follow a simple severity gradient and that psychological well-being is not solely determined by symptom burden. Socio-economic characteristics did not account for differences in caregiver adjustment, underscoring the importance of individualized psychological assessment and tailored interventions to support caregiver mental health.