Tray Application Versus the Standard Surgical Procedure: A Prospective Evaluation

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

(1) Background: trays are surgery-specific sets of required materials and medical devices, assembled in consultation between manufacturer and user, and provided in a sterile package.; (2) Methods: in a high-volume urological center performing 11,920 operations/procedures annually (2023), we prospectively evaluated the effect of trays compared with the standard approach in a comparative study of 64 operations conducted between October 29 and November 30, 2024. The primary endpoints were the amount of operating room (OR) waste (volume/cm³, weight/g) and setup time (minutes). The secondary endpoint was the workflow assessment by nursing staff, rated on a numerical score (0–10) across seven relevant domains.; (3) Results: for endourological procedures, setup time was reduced by 35%, operating room (OR) waste by 34%, and waste volume by 19.0%. Workflow was positively rated with a mean score of 9.75/10. For major open procedures, setup time was reduced by 43%, waste weight by 24.8%, and waste volume by 32%. Workflow was positively rated with a mean score of 8.9/10; (4) Conclusions: Trays have a sustainable and significant impact on reducing OR waste, save nursing staff preparation time, and facilitate improved workflow in the operating room.

Article activity feed