Quality of Life Outcomes After Endoscopic Cholesteatoma Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Cholesteatoma is a destructive middle ear lesion that compromises hearing and quality of life, for which endoscopic ear surgery (EES) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to microscopic approaches. While recurrence and audiological outcomes are frequently reported, patient-centered evaluations using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remain limited. Objective: This study aimed to assess postoperative quality of life in patients undergoing exclusive endoscopic cholesteatoma surgery, using validated patient-reported outcome measures. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study in a tertiary referral center, enrolling 41 patients who underwent exclusive endoscopic cholesteatoma surgery over 20 months. Pre- and postoperative QoL was assessed using the Chronic Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 (COMQ-12) and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). Follow-up included assessments at 3, 6, and 12 months, complemented by non–echo–planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MRI) to detect residual or recurrent disease. Results: COMQ-12 scores improved significantly from baseline (54.0 ± 4.2) to 12 months (10.2 ± 3.3; mean difference –43.8, 95% CI: –46.1 to –41.5; p < 0.001). GBI scores were consistently high, increasing from 82.6 ± 4.8 at 6 months to 84.1 ± 4.9 at 12 months (p < 0.001). Audiometric evaluation demonstrated a significant postoperative improvement, with the mean air–bone gap (ABG) decreasing from 52.1 ± 5.3 dB pre-operatively to 26.4 ± 4.7 dB postoperatively (p < 0.001), indicating substantial closure of the conductive gap. Conclusions: Exclusive endoscopic cholesteatoma surgery is associated with significant improvement in disease-specific and general QoL, favorable audiological outcomes, and low recurrence rates. These findings support EES as a safe, effective, and patient-centered alternative to microscopic techniques for the management of middle ear cholesteatoma.

Article activity feed