Comparative Quantification of the Negative Impact of Pesticide Use in an Agricultural Region of Mexico
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
The continued use of agrochemicals in Valle de Arista, SLP, Mexico, has generated loss of effectiveness of active ingredients and impacts on public health and the environment. To identify environmental and socioeconomic impacts, a quantification method was designed using the Kovach Environmental Impact Quotient and environmental accounting of pesticides (Leach and Mumford) that included agricultural diagnosis and identification of agrochemical impacts. Producers, technical advisors and agrochemicals dealers were surveyed as key agents of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and chili pepper crops (Capsicum annuum) due to their economic importance. Gower quotation coefficients were calculated to measure similarity of quantitative, qualitative and dichotomous variables with continuous, discrete and binary characteristics. The use of fungicides (carbendazim and chlorothalonil) showed the greatest environmental impact, followed by insecticides (endosulfan and thiametoxam) and herbicides. The negative externality averaged US$15.60 ha−1 annually, corresponding to 50% of tomato, 31.25% of poblano pepper and 18.75% of serrano pepper. Estimated damages due to the use of greenhouses were 37.7% to the consumer, 21.2% to the worker, 14.8% to aquatic life, 3.6% to birds, 9.2% to bees and 3.3% to insects.