Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma. Does Tumor Location Matter?

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: to investigate the effect of tumor location on surgical and oncological outcomes in patients receiving robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RANU) for upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC). Methods: a case-control study of 60 consecutive patients with UTUC who underwent RANU, no exclusions. Patients were divided into two groups based on tumor location: 20 patients (33%) with ureteral tumors (Group 1) and 40 patients (67%) with renal pelvis tumors (Group 2). Demographics, perioperative data, and pathology were analyzed. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. Results: The rates of console time, blood transfusion, and complications were comparable in both groups. Group 1 had longer hospital stays (8.3 days vs. 7.5 days, p = 0.03) and higher readmission rates (20% vs. 5%, p = 0.07). In oncological outcomes, the T-stage distribution was similar. High-grade pathology was present in 72.5% of Group 2 and 50% of Group 1 (p = 0.04). All achieved R0 resection. Over a median 28-month follow-up, 5 patients experienced bladder recurrence (p = 0.5), and 7 (12%) developed distant metastases (p = 0.6). Cancer-specific death occurred in 5 patients, and 4 died from unrelated causes. The CSS and OS rates were 92% and 85%, respectively, with no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.7, p = 0.5). Conclusion: Our current research did not demonstrate that tumor location significantly affects postoperative surgical and oncological outcomes following RANU for UTUC. Additional studies are needed to explore the proposed hypothesis.

Article activity feed