Organizational Features and Employee Well-Being in Home Health Care and Rehabilitation: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Republic of Croatia

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Population ageing and the policy shift toward care at home elevate the importance of how home and community-based services (HCBS) are organized and staffed. We aimed to describe provider and workforce characteristics, quantify core employee outcomes, and examine prespecified associations between organizational context, work organization, and quality-monitoring practices in HCBS for older adults. This cross-sectional study was conducted in home health care and rehabilitation settings in the Republic of Croatia. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of two coordinated surveys: institutions providing home or community nursing and rehabilitation (N = 60) and their employees engaged in direct care (N = 517). Only aggregate tabulations were available to the authors. Descriptives included counts, percentages, means, and 95% confidence intervals. Bivariate analyses used Spearman’s ρ for ordinal–ordinal relations, χ² tests with Cramér’s V for categorical associations, and Mann–Whitney or Kruskal–Wallis tests with η²_H for ordinal outcomes. Complete-case procedures were applied with α = 0.05. Results: Private ownership predominated among institutions (85.0%). Referral pathways were universally anchored in primary care and patient or family self-referral (both 100%), with hospitals reported by 58.3%. The workforce was predominantly female (86.7%) and experienced (mean tenure and home-care experience ≈10 years). Job satisfaction was high (27.3% very satisfied, 68.1% satisfied) and turnover intention low (4.9%). Satisfaction correlated inversely with turnover intention (ρ = −0.513, p < 0.001) and positively with willingness to recommend the job (ρ = 0.265, p < 0.001); turnover intention correlated inversely with willingness to recommend (ρ = −0.210, p < 0.001). Institutions differed by area and managerial presence in measuring patient satisfaction and reporting annual performance (V ≈ 0.36–0.50), whereas headcounts did not vary by area (η²_H ≈ 0.00–0.02). Longer inter-visit travel was associated with more frequent heavy lifting (χ²(3) = 11.259, p < 0.05; V ≈ 0.15). Conclusions: In this HCBS context, employee attitudes were favorable and showed coherent gradients, while organizational variation concentrated in governance and quality-monitoring practices rather than scale. Findings support targeted managerial and measurement capacity building, alongside ergonomic prevention, and motivate multilevel and prospective studies.

Article activity feed