Developing a Health System Literacy Measure for Chinese Immigrants in Canada: Adapting the HLS19-NAV Scale
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background: Health system literacy is crucial for immigrants to navigate health care systems and access necessary services. Little is known about how well immigrants understand and use the healthcare system in Canada. This study aimed to adapt and validate a health system literacy scale for the Canada context (HSL-CAN) using factor analysis approach. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from March 11st to July 19th, 2024, among Chinese individuals aged 30 or older who have lived in Canada for at least 6 months. The HSL-CAN was developed through a literature review, patient and provider consultation, and adaptation of the European Health Literacy Population Survey 2019-2021 for navigational health literacy measurement (HLS19 – NAV). The measure was translated into Simplified and Traditional Chinese, and its content was evaluated by stakeholders’ feedback. Structural validity was evaluated using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analysis. Convergent and discriminant validity were tested using correlations with the HLS19-SF12 and known-group validity was evaluated by using ANOVA or ttest and reporting effect size. Internal consistency was evaluated through Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and composite reliability. Results: Initially, HSL-CAN contained 25 items developed using a 5-Likert response scale. Some minor revisions were made according to the stakeholders’ feedback (n=12). Five items with factor loading < 0.4 were removed based on the EFA. The one-factor CFA satisfied good fit indices: CFI=0.960, TLI=0.955, SRMR=0.033, RMSEA (90%CI) = 0.025(0.016-0.032), and χ^2/df ratio of 1.41. The scale showed a solid internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha=0.81; composite reliability=0.812). For convergent and discriminant validity, the HSL-CAN showed a high correlation with the ‘health care’ construct but a low correlation with the ‘health prevention and promotion construct’ construct of HLS19 – SF12. Known-group validity showed large mean differences by education, income, non-cancer chronic comorbidities, and small to moderate mean differences by gender, age groups, employment status, self-rated health, and assistance needed to see a healthcare provider. Conclusion: Study findings provide evidence that the HSL-CAN is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating health system literacy in Chinese population in Canada. However, further refinement is recommended before using this scale to the general population in Canada.