Philosophy’s Phantom Pain: On the Uses and Disadvantages of the Cartesian Legacy
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
This essay argues that the classic mind-body problem is a pseudo-problem resulting from an outdated substance-based ontology. Instead of searching for a causal bridge between two separate entities (res cogitans and res extensa), a dissolution of the problem is proposed through a paradigm shift towards a processual, dynamic perspective. Based on a synthesis of the free energy principle (Friston), synergetics (Haken), spatio-temporal brain dynamics (Northoff), and 4E cognitive science (Gallagher), a unified model of the brain-mind system is developed. In this model, “body” and “mind” appear not as substances but as two inseparable perspectives—the physical score and the phenomenal performance—on a single, self-organizing process. A mechanism of downward causation is postulated, in which meaning and values function as the highest-level order parameter, shaping neural dynamics by modulating precision weighting. The philosophical consequence is an absolution from a chronic ailment of metaphysics, which is revealed to be the phantom pain of an amputated ontological assumption.