Ten-Year Outcomes of Cervical Arteries Dissection: A Retrospective Study in a Real-World Cohort
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Introduction. Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is a rare condition, being one of the leading causes of stroke in patients under the age of 45, with a reported prevalence of up to 20%. The management of CAD remains controversial due to its rarity and the lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials. The aim of this study was to report the long-term outcomes of CAD in a real-world setting. Methods. This retrospective, observational, single-center study included patients diagnosed with CAD between 2010 and 2019 (approval number: 153/2015/U/Oss/AOUBo). Clinical presentation, risk factors, and medical therapies were prospectively analyzed. Management strategies included both medical and interventional approaches. Follow-up consisted of annual clinical visits and carotid duplex ultrasound (DUS), with telephone interviews every six months. The primary endpoint was defined by the overall long-term stroke/death rate and in relation to the type of medical treatment, localization of the dissection and clinical manifestations. Results. A total of 62 patients were included, predominantly male (65%) with a mean age of 58 (± 2) years. Thirteen dissections (21%) were trauma-related. CAD locations included the common carotid artery in 6 cases (10%), extracranial internal carotid artery in 29 (46%), intracranial internal carotid artery in 9 (14%), and vertebral artery in 16 (25%). One patient (2%) had dissections in both the extracranial internal carotid and vertebral arteries, and another (2%) in both the vertebral and basilar arteries. Bilateral dissections were observed in 5 patients (8%). Ischemic manifestations occurred in 43 patients (68%): 10 transient ischemic attacks (16%), 17 minor strokes (27%), and 16 major strokes (25%), with ischemic lesions on cerebral CT in 31 cases (72%). Fifty-eight (93%) patients were treated medically (anticoagulants and/or antiplatelets), while 4 patients (7%) underwent surgical or endovascular intervention. The mean follow-up was 81 ± 35 months. During this period, 2 patients (4%) experienced stroke and 15 (24%) died. The estimated 10-year survival rate was 71%, and the 10-year stroke/death-free survival rate was 70%. Among medically treated patients, the 10-year stroke/death-free survival was 86% for those on anticoagulation and 67% for those on antiplatelet therapy (p = .1). Patients presenting with ischemic symptoms had a lower estimated 10-year stroke/death-free survival rate compared to those with non-ischemic presentations (61% vs. 69%, p = .7). Patients with dissection of the common carotid artery had a significantly lower estimated 10-year stroke/death-free survival rate (25%), compared to dissections in other cervical arteries (p=.001). Conclusions. In this real-world, single-center experience, cervical artery dissection was associated with a favorable long-term prognosis in most cases, especially among patients managed conservatively with medical therapy. Stroke and mortality rates were relatively low during extended follow-up. Although no statistically significant difference was observed between anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, the trend favored anticoagulation for stroke/death-free survival. Patients with CCA dissections had significantly worse 10-year stroke/death-free survival compared to those with dissections in other cervical arteries.