Hyperreflective Dots on SD-OCT: Implications for Predicting Treatment Outcomes in Diabetic Macular Edema

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between hyperreflective dots (HRDs) observed on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and the outcomes following treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab or dexamethasone injections in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: This retrospective study focused on individuals suffering from diabetic macular edema (DME) who underwent a sequence of three intravitreal ranibizumab injections. Based on treatment response, the eyes were categorized into two groups: responders and non-responders. The non-responder group subsequently received intravitreal dexamethasone (IVO) implants. Treatment results were evaluated by changes in BCVA, HRD number, and central macular thickness (CMT). Results: This research involved 112 eyes from 78 participants who had been diagnosed with DME. Seventy-three eyes (65%) were identified as ranibizumab responders and 39 eyes (35%) as ranibizumab non-responders. Of the 39 individuals who had suboptimal response to ranibizumab and subsequently received treatment with an intravitreal dexamethasone implant, 26 eyes (66.67%) exhibited a favorable response, while 13 eyes (33.33%) showed an insufficient response. IVR responders demonstrated significantly greater improvements in BCVA (0.54 ± 0.73 to 0.35 ± 0.40 logMAR vs. 0.52 ± 0.61 to 0.47 ± 0.38 logMAR) and CMT (456.53 ± 109.73 μm to 235.47 ± 49.13 μm vs. 468.99 ± 127.10 μm to 427.45 ± 52.91 μm) reduction. Baseline analysis revealed IVR non-responders had higher counts of both inner and outer retinal HRDs compared to responders (9.09 ± 3.38 vs. 7.07 ± 2.32 and 5.46 ± 2.03 vs. 4.27 ± 1.87, p < 0.05, respectively). Eyes with initially higher numbers of inner retinal HRDs, outer retinal HRDs, and subretinal HRDs demonstrated a significantly enhanced response to dexamethasone therapy (9.03 ± 3.18 vs. 7.55 ± 2.72, 6.55 ± 2.46 vs. 4.79 ± 1.88 and 0.27 ± 0.54 vs. 0.21 ± 0.47, p < 0.05, respectively). Conclusions: HRDs could potentially be used as a predictive biomarker to assess the effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy in treating DME. Patients exhibiting a greater number of retinal HRDs tend to have less favorable reactions to anti-VEGF treatments but experience improved results with dexamethasone.

Article activity feed