Dark Reflections: The Influence of Leader Dark Triad on Employee Dark Triad in Higher Education Institutions

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

This study explores the reciprocal relationship between Leader Dark Triad (LDT) and Employee Dark Triad (EDT) traits in higher education institutions (HEIs). While toxic leadership—defined by Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy—is typically viewed as a top-down influence, this study challenges that assumption by examining how these traits are both projected by leaders and reflected or reinforced by employees. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study surveyed 100 HEI employees using expanded 24-item dark trait scales and conducted thematic interviews with selected participants. Quantitative analysis revealed a statistically significant and moderately strong positive correlation (ρ = 0.607, p < 0.001) between Leader and Employee Dark Triad traits. Ordinal logistic regression further confirmed that Leader Dark Triad scores significantly predict Employee traits, with a model fit indicating over 99% of the variance explained. These findings support the hypothesis that dark traits are mutually reinforced across hierarchical boundaries. Qualitative findings further demonstrated how dark behaviours are internalised through toxic role modelling, shadow projection, and defensive imitation. Employees often rationalised unethical actions by referencing similar conduct from their leaders, suggesting a contagion effect not only of behaviour but of organisational norms. This study incorporates feedback loops into the Toxic Triangle framework and draws on Jung’s Shadow Theory and Social Learning Theory to explain how ethical erosion becomes institutionalised over time. This study concludes that dark leadership fosters dark followership, and together they create an ethical drift that threatens institutional integrity. Overall, the results of this study call for leadership profiling, cultural audits, and systemic reform to disrupt this dynamic and promote psychological safety and moral accountability in academic institutions.

Article activity feed