Preliminary Analysis of the GDR-G Data Products of Jason-3 Satellite Altimeter

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

In early 2025, the Jason-3 satellite’s orbit shifted from an “interleaved” to a tandem configuration with Sentinel-6A, and its Geophysical Data Records (GDR) were upgraded from Version F to G. This study evaluated GDR-G via eight processing approaches, using Jason-3’s last six GDR-F cycles (#394–#399) and first six GDR-G cycles (#501–#506), integrating histogram/geographical distribution analyses of Sea Surface Height Anomaly (SSHA), Significant Wave Height (SWH), Wind Speed (WS), and multi-method validation (e.g., self-cross-calibration). Key findings include the following: GDR-G had significantly lower SSHA noise than GDR-F, with up to ~4 cm SSHA bias from different retrackers/corrections; Adaptive retracker + 3D Sea State Bias (SSB) correction achieved optimal accuracy. Adaptive retracker’s SWH/WS anomalies linked to invalid MLE4 results and non-Brownian waveforms (coastal/sea ice). A detrending method was proposed, and the 41-point Lanczos window was optimal for smoothing. The results from the “detrending method” were consistent with the results based on the SSHA spectrum and classic self-cross-calibration methods. A ~5 mm drop was observed in Jason-3 GDR-G MLE4 baseline SSHA, probably caused by GDR upgrade or geographic sampling mismatch, while Sentinel-6A’s GDR-G upgrade might induce ~1 cm jump. The jumps along with GDR version upgrade highlighted the value of timely in situ absolute calibration.

Article activity feed