A Randomized Trial on the Benefits of Refitting Symptomatic Contact Lens Wearers with Daily Disposable Lenses

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background/Objective: Contact lens discomfort (CLD) is a prevalent issue affecting up to 50% of wearers and contributes to discontinuation in approximately 30% of cases. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of refitting symptomatic monthly replacement contact lens (CL) wearers with a new daily, disposable contact lens (Kalifilcon A DDCL) and to compare its effectiveness against a placebo CL. Methods: Seventy-nine symptomatic wearers (CLDEQ-8 ≥ 12; mean age 27.07 ± 8.38 years; 77% female) were recruited and randomly assigned to wear either Kalifilcon A DDCLs or placebo CLs. Participants were assessed at baseline and after one month of CL wear. Subjective measures included the CLDEQ-8 and the NEI VFQ-25 questionnaire. Objective assessments included tear film stability and ocular surface health. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-tests and repeated-measures ANOVA. Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons, and results were reported with effect sizes (Cohen’s d) and 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Kalifilcon A DDCL wearers showed a significant reduction in CLDEQ-8 scores (18.5 ± 4.6 to 10.8 ± 8.5; p < 0.005; Cramer’s V: 0.594; 95% CI: 13.35–15.34), with only 33% remaining symptomatic. Vision-related quality of life improved (75.83 ± 8.0 to 83.5 ± 8.6; p < 0.005; Cramer’s V: 0.977; 95% CI: 78.54–80.81), especially in ocular pain (p < 0.001; Cramer’s V: 0.755; 95% CI: 54.73–58.88), role difficulties (p < 0.001; Cramer’s V: 0.812; 95% CI: 35.12–42.77), and color vision (p < 0.05; Cramer’s V: 0.575; 95% CI: 93.07–95.63). Compared to the placebo CL, Kalifilcon A DDCLs led to greater improvements in comfort (p < 0.0001; Cramer’s V: 0.329; 95% CI: 7.22–7.74), visual acuity (p < 0.0001; Cramer’s V: 0.267; 95% CI: 7.38–7.85), and satisfaction (p = 0.005; Cramer’s V: 0.208; 95% CI: 7.70–8.18). Tear film stability also improved significantly (p < 0.05), with no changes observed in the placebo group. Conclusions: Refitting symptomatic CL wearers with Kalifilcon A DDCLs significantly improves comfort, reduces CLD symptoms, and enhances vision-related quality of life. These results support its use as a beneficial alternative to monthly CLs in symptomatic individuals.

Article activity feed