Relational Humor and Identity Framing in the “Virgin vs. Chad” Meme Format

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Extremist narratives construct a morally superior in-group threatened by a dangerous out-group, legitimizing defensive or hostile actions while dismissing opposing view-points. These narratives are also observable in internet humour, where memes take on a special protragonism. This article examines how the “Virgin vs. Chad” meme format, as an archetypal representation of the in-group and the out-group, operates as a mul-timodal vehicle for ideological expression within far-right digital cultures, with a focus on the Spanish case. The analysis is based on a dataset of seventeen memes collected from the platform X as part of the European HORIZON project ARENAS. Using a three-layered analytical framework—narrative ideology, semiotic-linguistic grammar, and humour dynam-ics—the study explores how political antagonisms are constructed, visualized, and af-fectively encoded through this meme format. The findings show that the meme format performs symbolic compression by staging binary oppositions between in-group and out-group identities, typically valorising fig-ures associated with nationalism, masculinity, and epistemic certainty, while delegiti-mizing those aligned with progressivism, pluralism, or emotional expressiveness. These meanings are stabilized through repeated visual and typographic conventions, including character archetypes, split-panel layouts, and indexical stylization. Humour operates not as a peripheral element but as a core logic: it licenses aggression, disci-plines ambiguity, and facilitates affective alignment through irony, reversal, and ridi-cule. By integrating insights from humour theory, narrative framing, and multimodal dis-course analysis, this article demonstrates how memes function as affective infrastruc-tures—mechanisms through which ideological content is rendered emotionally reso-nant and socially permissible. It contributes to scholarship on digital extremism and narrative studies by offering a methodological model for analysing how humour and visual stylization regulate stance, identity, and belonging in online political ecologies.

Article activity feed