Evaluation of a Non-Stagnant Water Gap in Hollow-Fiber Membrane Distillation and Multistage Performance Limitations
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Hollow fiber water gap membrane distillation (HF-WGMD) modules are gaining attention for desalination applications due to their compact design and high surface-area-to-volume ratio. This study presents a comprehensive CFD model to analyze and compare the performance of two HF-WGMD module configurations: one with a conventional stagnant water gap (WG) and the other incorporating water gap flow circulation. The model was validated against experimental data, showing excellent agreement, and was then used to simulate flow patterns in the feed, water gap, and coolant domains. Results indicate that, at a feed temperature of 80 °C with a stagnant WG, employing a turbulent flow scheme in the feed side increases permeate flux by 20.7% compared to laminar flow, while increasing coolant flow rate have a minor impact. In contrast, introducing circulation within the water gap significantly enhances performance, boosting permeate flux by 30.1%. This effect becomes more pronounced with rising feed temperature: increasing from 50 °C to 80 °C leads to a flux increase from 6.74 to 27.89 kg/(m²·h) under circulating WG conditions. However, in multi-stage systems, the energy efficiency trade-off becomes evident. Water gap circulation is more energy-efficient than the stagnant configuration only for systems with fewer than 20 stages. At higher stage counts, the stagnant WG setup proves more efficient. For example, at 80 °C and 50 stages, the stagnant configuration consumes just 793 kWh/m³, representing a 47.3% reduction in energy consumption compared to the circulating WG setup. These findings highlight the performance benefits and energy trade-offs of water gap circulation in HF-WGMD systems, providing valuable guidance for optimizing high-efficiency desalination module designs.