Assessing the Suitability of Available Global Forest Maps as Reference Tools for EUDR-Compliant Deforestation Monitoring

Deforestation monitoring is critical to support compliance with regulatory frameworks such as the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), which requires that products containing or derived from beef, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, rubber, soy, and timber are deforestation-free after 31 December 2020. Earth observation (EO) offers a means to assess deforestation, yet map-based verification remains technically limited and uncertain. This study addresses the lack of a systematic assessment of global Forest/Non-Forest (FNF), Tree Cover/Non-Tree Cover (TC/NTC) and Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) datasets by identifying and evaluating 21 publicly available global forest/tree cover reference maps for their alignment with EUDR criteria. This goes beyond merely treating these datasets as simply “fit” or “not fit” for the purpose of the EUDR, but rather aims to assess how well each dataset meets the needs compared to others, acknowledging strengths, weaknesses, and trade-offs. The 21 datasets are reviewed based on EUDR-related parameters (temporal proximity, spatial resolution, and forest definition) as well as accuracy metrics. From this broader review, eight datasets are shortlisted based on their alignment with key regulatory requirements. However, most datasets fail to fully meet all EUDR requirements, particularly forest definitions, with only two datasets satisfying all indicators. Notably, all datasets are unable to distinguish forests from other non-forest, tree-based systems. Reported accuracy metrics reveal a general overestimation of forest areas, while canopy height-based maps tend to underestimate tree cover, potentially excluding forested regions. Regional comparisons show more consistent estimates in South America, while Europe and North America display greater variability. These findings support informed decision-making by companies and policymakers for selecting suitable datasets, while also highlighting conflicts and challenges associated with the use of global forest/tree cover maps for regulatory compliance.