10-Year Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Segmentectomy for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objectives: Robotic-assisted segmentectomy (RAS) has proven to be safe and feasible for early-stage lung cancer; nonetheless, its oncologic efficacy and long-term outcomes are still debated. We aimed to explore whether RAS could be an alternative to robot-ic-assisted lobectomy (RAL) in early-stage NSCLC, focusing on long-term outcomes such as 10-year cancer-specific survival (CSS), cumulative rate of relapse (RR), and local recurrence (LR). Methods: Patients undergoing RAS for early-stage NSCLC (clinical stage I) were ana-lyzed from August 2007 to August 2023. A 1:3 propensity score-matched analysis was performed among patients undergoing RAL, based on demographic characteristics and pathological stage. Primary endpoints were CSS, RR, and LR. Results: A total of 40 patients undergoing RAS were retrospectively enrolled. After matching 120 patients undergoing RAL, no significant differences were found in post-operative complications, median operative time, or length of hospital stay. Patients undergoing RAS had comparable 10-year CSS (p=0.90) and RR (p=0.99) to those un-dergoing RAL, whereas 10-year of cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR) was 11.0% (95% CI: 3.4% – 23.7%) for RAS patients, and 2.8% (95% CI: 0.5% – 8.9%) for RAL patients (p = 0.08). Additionally, RAL provided a significantly higher number of N1 and N2 lymph node retrievals (p < 0.0001 and 0.06, respectively), as well as a high-er number of N2 stations (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Based on our experiences, even though RAS can ensure excellent long-term outcomes in selected cases of early-stage NSCLC, comparable to RAL, the local recurrence rate was higher in the RAS group.